Tolling the statute of limitations in Michigan

Tolling the statute of limitations in Michigan

7 min read

Published September 3, 2025 • Updated April 23, 2026 • By DocketMath Team

Article claim inventory in progress

Trust release 4

This page has legal or numeric text that still needs claim-level inventory before we can treat it as verified.

Direct answer

Run this scenario in DocketMath using the Statute Of Limitations calculator.

In Michigan, the general statute of limitations is 6 years, and tolling rules determine whether that clock pauses, extends, or otherwise changes your filing deadline under the specific tolling doctrine you’re researching. For most matters governed by Michigan’s general/default period, the starting baseline is MCL § 767.24(1), which reflects a 6-year limitations period.

Because tolling depends on why the SOL should stop (for example, certain legal disabilities or procedural events), the “tolling the statute of limitations in Michigan” question is best treated as a two-step workflow:

  1. Identify the base SOL period (here, 6 years for the general/default rule), and
  2. Identify the tolling trigger(s) and the tolling window that changes how the deadline is calculated.

Note: This post is jurisdiction-aware and calculator-oriented, but it’s not legal advice. Use it to structure your research and the inputs for DocketMath.

What you need to know

Michigan’s default timeline for the general SOL is 6 years, and the “clock” analysis begins with (a) the applicable limitations statute and (b) the date you treat as the start/accrual trigger. For this guide, your provided jurisdiction data is the general/default period: 6 years under MCL § 767.24(1).

The key concept: tolling changes the “clock,” not just the calendar

Tolling doctrines generally affect the deadline in one (or sometimes more) of these ways:

  • Pause (stop) the clock for a period, then resume
  • Extend the end date by the amount of time tolled
  • Defer accrual (some doctrines effectively change when the clock starts)
  • Reset timing in narrow contexts (less common than pause/extend)

How DocketMath fits in

In DocketMath, the calculated “last day to file” generally depends on three types of inputs:

  • Start/accrual/trigger date (your chosen “clock start” date)
  • Base SOL period (here, 6 years)
  • Tolling period window(s) (start/end dates or equivalent tolling duration you enter)

If you enter tolling in the calculator, the computed deadline will shift. Even relatively short tolling windows can matter a lot against a 6-year baseline—so the exact dates you use for the start and tolling window are crucial.

Step-by-step

  1. Confirm the base limitations period

    • Use 6 years as the general/default baseline for Michigan in this guide.
    • Anchor that to MCL § 767.24(1).
    • Important: your briefing explicitly notes no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found, so this content applies the general/default SOL only—not a specialized SOL for a particular claim type.
  2. Choose the correct “start” date

    • Your calculated deadline depends on the date you treat as the SOL “start.”
    • Common approaches include an accrual date, a discovery-related date (if applicable), or another statutory trigger date—whatever matches the doctrine you’re using.
    • Whatever you choose, keep it consistent with your tolling theory.
  3. Identify whether tolling is actually triggered

    • Tolling generally isn’t automatic.
    • You’ll need a researched basis for a recognized tolling trigger that fits your facts.
    • In DocketMath terms, you’re trying to identify the tolling start and tolling end (or duration) that matches the doctrine.
  4. Translate the tolling trigger into a time window

    • In practice, you enter:
      • Tolling start date, and
      • Tolling end date (or the length of tolling)
    • Then make sure the tolling window overlaps the period where the SOL clock is actually running under your chosen start date.
    • If tolling is input outside the relevant running period, the calculator may show little or no effect.
  5. Run DocketMath

    • Use the primary calculator link: /tools/statute-of-limitations
    • After the first run, adjust inputs if:
      • your start/accrual date changes based on new facts, or
      • your tolling window start/end dates change after you confirm the timeline.
  6. Document assumptions so you can rerun quickly Keep a short record of:

    • the start/accrual date you used
    • the base SOL (6 years, MCL § 767.24(1))
    • the tolling doctrine (name it in your notes)
    • the tolling start/end dates you entered

Key statutes and citations

  • MCL § 767.24(1) — Michigan’s 6-year general limitations period (used here as the baseline)

This guide uses the general/default period because the brief notes: no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found. If your specific claim is governed by a different Michigan limitations statute, you would need to replace the base SOL with that claim-type statute before applying any tolling concept.

Source (jurisdiction data used in this guide): https://www.michigan.gov

Common pitfalls

  • Using the wrong base SOL

    • Applying the 6-year general/default period when a different statute controls can materially change the outcome.
  • Assuming tolling automatically applies

    • Tolling requires a specific trigger tied to the facts. Without a recognized basis, the calculator inputs can give a result that doesn’t match the legal reality.
  • Entering tolling dates incorrectly

    • Off-by-one-day errors or reversing tolling start/end dates can shift the computed deadline.
  • Overextending the tolling window

    • The tolling window should typically match the time during which the tolling trigger is actually in effect—not a broader “everything was happening” period.
  • Failing to rerun after correcting the start date

    • If you later determine that accrual/start happened earlier or later than you assumed, it can change how much (if any) of the tolling window actually overlaps the running SOL period.

Pitfall to watch: treating a later “event date” as the clock start when accrual actually occurred earlier can create a deadline that looks safer than it should be under a 6-year baseline.

Run the numbers

Use DocketMath to stress-test timelines with the same base assumptions, then swap in your real dates.

Illustrative scenario table (example structure only)

Assume:

  • Base SOL: 6 years under **MCL § 767.24(1)
  • Start/accrual date used: January 15, 2020
ScenarioTolling window you inputBase SOL end (no tolling)Effect of tollingNew end date (approx.)
A (no tolling)NoneJan 15, 2026+0Jan 15, 2026
B (short pause)Mar 1, 2022 → Aug 31, 2022Jan 15, 2026+6 months~Jul 15, 2026
C (long pause)Mar 1, 2022 → Feb 28, 2023Jan 15, 2026+12 months~Jan 15, 2027

How the output changes:

  • The more time you identify as tollable (and the more accurately the tolling window overlaps the running SOL period), the more the computed “last day” can move.
  • If your tolling window doesn’t overlap the active running period under your selected start date, the calculator may show no practical extension.

DocketMath input checklist (jurisdiction-aware for Michigan general/default)

Before calculating, confirm:

Then calculate using: /tools/statute-of-limitations
If the deadline result surprises you, rerun after checking:

  1. the start date, and
  2. whether the tolling window actually overlaps the running period.

Related reading