Statute of Limitations for Statute of Repose in Michigan
7 min read
Published April 8, 2026 • By DocketMath Team
Statute of Limitations for Statute of Repose in Michigan
Overview
Michigan’s general default statute of limitations is 6 years, and the cited general statute is MCL § 767.24(1). Because no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found for this reference page, the 6-year period is the baseline you should use unless a more specific Michigan statute controls the claim.
A quick terminology check helps here:
- A statute of limitations sets the deadline for filing a claim after it accrues.
- A statute of repose cuts off claims after a fixed period tied to an event, even if the injury is discovered later.
- In practice, people often search for both together because the filing deadline can depend on when the cause of action accrued, when the harm was discovered, and whether a separate repose rule applies.
For Michigan reference work, the safest starting point is the general 6-year period in MCL § 767.24(1), then test whether a more specific statute changes the result.
Note: This page summarizes the general Michigan deadline only. If a claim has a claim-specific deadline, that specific rule controls over the general default period.
If you need to check a filing window quickly, use the DocketMath statute of limitations calculator to map the claim date against the applicable deadline.
Limitation period
Michigan’s general limitation period is 6 years under MCL § 767.24(1).
That means the default filing window is measured in years, not months or days, and the clock typically begins when the claim accrues under the relevant rule for that claim. Since this page is a reference summary, the main practical takeaway is straightforward:
- Default period: 6 years
- Citation: MCL § 767.24(1)
- Scope: General/default period only
- Claim-specific override: Not identified for this page
How the calculator uses these inputs
DocketMath’s calculator works best when you enter the dates that drive the deadline:
- Accrual date or event date — the date the claim began to run
- Filing date — the date the complaint was filed or will be filed
- Jurisdiction — Michigan
- Any tolling or pause periods — if the claim was suspended for a legally recognized reason
The output changes based on those inputs:
| Input | What it changes |
|---|---|
| Earlier accrual date | Usually shortens the remaining time |
| Later accrual date | Usually extends the remaining time |
| Tolling period | Pauses or extends the running deadline |
| Different claim type | May replace the general 6-year default with a specific period |
Practical examples
- A claim that accrued on January 1, 2020 with a 6-year period would generally run through January 1, 2026.
- A claim that accrued on July 15, 2021 would generally run through July 15, 2027.
- If a tolling rule applies, the deadline may move later by the tolling duration.
These examples are purely for reference. The correct deadline always depends on the governing statute and the specific facts that trigger accrual, tolling, or repose.
Key exceptions
Michigan’s general 6-year period is the starting point, but exceptions can change the deadline in three common ways: a specific statute can replace the default rule, tolling can extend the filing window, or a repose rule can end the claim earlier.
1) Claim-specific statutes can override the general period
If Michigan law provides a special deadline for the claim type, that specific statute controls instead of the 6-year default. In other words, the general rule is not the final answer when a more targeted statute applies.
Common examples in deadline analysis include categories where the legislature sets a different filing window than the general one. For reference-page work, the key point is not the claim label alone, but whether the statute you are checking contains its own deadline.
2) Tolling can extend the filing period
Tolling pauses or extends the clock in limited circumstances recognized by law. That can happen when:
- the claimant is under a legally recognized disability,
- service issues affect the filing timeline,
- a statutory pause applies,
- or another rule suspends the running of time.
A tolling issue changes the calculator result because the elapsed time is not counted the same way as ordinary calendar time.
3) A statute of repose can cut off the claim earlier
A statute of repose is different from a statute of limitations. It can bar a claim after a fixed number of years from a triggering event, even if the injury was not yet discovered. That means a repose period can be shorter or functionally harsher than the ordinary filing deadline.
For that reason, users should not assume the 6-year general limitation period is the only deadline involved. If a repose rule exists for the claim type, the earlier cutoff may control.
4) Discovery rules may affect accrual
Some claims do not begin the clock at the moment of the underlying conduct. Instead, the date of discovery—or the date the injury reasonably should have been discovered—can matter.
That changes the calculation in a meaningful way:
- Conduct date and injury date may be different
- Discovery date may start the clock later
- The calculator output may differ depending on which trigger the statute uses
Warning: A later-discovered injury does not automatically extend every Michigan deadline. If a repose statute applies, discovery may not save the claim.
Statute citation
Michigan’s general default period is MCL § 767.24(1), with a 6-year limitation period.
Citation table
| Item | Michigan reference |
|---|---|
| General limitation period | 6 years |
| General statute | MCL § 767.24(1) |
| Jurisdiction | Michigan |
| Source basis | Michigan government source |
Because this is the general/default rule, use it as the baseline when no more specific Michigan deadline is identified. If a more specific statute governs the claim, that statute replaces the general period for that issue.
Reference checklist
- General Michigan deadline identified
- Period stated as 6 years
- General statute cited: MCL § 767.24(1)
- No claim-type-specific sub-rule found for this page
- Treat this as a default rule, not a universal claim deadline
Use the calculator
DocketMath’s calculator helps you turn the Michigan rule into a date-specific answer. Start with the claim’s key dates, then compare the filing date to the computed deadline.
Use it when you want to answer questions like:
- Is the claim still timely under the 6-year default?
- Did the deadline expire before filing?
- Does tolling change the result?
- Would a different accrual date produce a different cutoff?
Best inputs to enter
Accrual date
Use the date the claim began to run under the controlling rule.Filing date
Enter the date the complaint was filed or the intended filing date.Jurisdiction
Select Michigan.Tolling periods
Add any pauses that apply under the governing rule.
What the output tells you
- The deadline date
- Whether the filing is timely or late
- How much time remains, if any
- Whether a tolling adjustment changes the result
When to re-check the result
Re-run the calculation if any of these change:
- the claim type,
- the discovery date,
- the accrual date,
- or the presence of a repose rule.
That matters because a single date shift can change the outcome by months or even years.
Sources and references
Start with the primary authority for Michigan and confirm the effective date before relying on any output. If the rule has been amended, update the inputs and rerun the calculation.
Related reading
- Choosing the right statute of limitations tool for Vermont — How to choose the right calculator
- Statute of limitations in Singapore: how to estimate the deadline — Full how-to guide with jurisdiction-specific rules
- Choosing the right statute of limitations tool for Connecticut — How to choose the right calculator
