Statute of Limitations for Premises Liability / Slip and Fall in Arizona
6 min read
Published April 8, 2026 • By DocketMath Team
Overview
Run this scenario in DocketMath using the Statute Of Limitations calculator.
In Arizona, the statute of limitations for a premises liability / slip-and-fall claim is generally 2 years under A.R.S. § 13-107(A).
That default period is a starting point for many injury-related timing questions. Because timing rules can be affected by the specific facts and legal arguments in your case, treat the 2-year rule below as the general/default baseline, not an automatic guarantee for every situation. DocketMath’s statute-of-limitations calculator can help you model deadlines once you identify the key “start date” facts.
Note: The 2-year rule below is presented as the general/default period. A claim-type-specific sub-rule was not found for this brief, so this reference page relies on the general period as the default.
Limitation period
Arizona’s general limitation period for relevant actions is 2 years, stated in A.R.S. § 13-107(A). Practically, that usually means the clock begins to run after the event giving rise to the claim (for example, the slip-and-fall incident) and expires 2 years later, unless a recognized doctrine changes the deadline.
How the 2-year period is applied (what you’re really calculating)
When you use a limitations calculator, you’re typically determining:
- Incident date: the date of the slip-and-fall or other premises hazard event.
- Possible start date: the date the law treats as when the clock begins (often aligned with the incident date, but some fact patterns shift the analysis).
- Deadline date: the last date the claim must be filed/commenced under the applicable rule.
Because the “start date” can be the difference between timely and untimely, use DocketMath with the best-supported date you can document from your records.
A simple example (date math)
- Slip-and-fall occurred: March 1, 2024
- General SOL (default): 2 years
- Calculated deadline (default): March 1, 2026
If your “start date” changes—because the incident date is disputed, you’re evaluating discovery-type arguments, or you’re analyzing tolling/extension—your deadline may shift accordingly.
Checklist: inputs that commonly affect outputs
Use this checklist to decide what to enter into DocketMath:
Key exceptions
Arizona’s general SOL framework can be affected by doctrines that pause or extend time. For premises-injury timing, people most often run into these categories:
1) Tolling (time pauses under specific circumstances)
Certain legal events can pause the limitations clock. In general terms, tolling-type triggers may include:
- circumstances where the plaintiff is legally unable to bring suit during a period (often tied to disability concepts),
- pending proceedings that affect timing,
- legally required processes that can change when a deadline effectively runs.
Important: tolling is fact- and procedure-dependent. DocketMath can help you visualize how a pause/extension changes a deadline, but it can’t decide whether tolling is legally available in your situation.
Pitfall: Deadlines can look “close” when you count from the incident date, but tolling (if it applies) may add months—or more—so plan early rather than relying on approximate calculations.
2) Notice and procedural preconditions
Some premises-injury scenarios involve procedural prerequisites, such as notice steps (particularly in contexts involving certain entities or regulated claim processes). If a notice requirement applies, the “effective start date” and filing timing can become more complex than “incident date + 2 years.”
If your premises situation involves a government-owned/operated entity or another context with special procedures, you may need to account for separate notice timelines on top of the general SOL baseline.
3) Discovery-related arguments (fact-dependent)
Some legal systems allow arguments that the limitations period starts when the plaintiff discovered (or should have discovered) the injury or its cause. However, whether and how any discovery-related approach applies can be highly statute-specific and fact-specific.
For planning, it’s often safest to:
- compute the default deadline using the incident date, then
- adjust only if you have a strong, fact-based basis to support a different start date.
Statute citation
General statute of limitations period: 2 years
- A.R.S. § 13-107(A) (general limitation period referenced for this brief)
Source: https://www.findlaw.com/state/arizona-law/arizona-criminal-statute-of-limitations-laws.html?utm_source=openai
This reference page uses the 2-year default baseline and does not identify a claim-type-specific sub-rule for premises liability / slip-and-fall. If special timing rules apply in a given scenario (for example, notice procedures or a particular tolling doctrine), they may overlay or modify the general baseline.
(Gentle disclaimer: This content is for information and planning only, not legal advice. Timing can depend on your exact facts, filings, and procedural posture.)
Use the calculator
DocketMath’s statute-of-limitations calculator helps you generate a deadline date from key timeline inputs—especially useful when you’re working backward from a known filing goal or comparing alternatives based on different “start dates.”
Go to the tool
Start here: /tools/statute-of-limitations
What to enter in DocketMath (and how outputs change)
Use these inputs to model the default and any adjusted scenarios:
- Jurisdiction: US-AZ
- Selecting Arizona ensures the calculator applies the 2-year default baseline.
- Start date (incident date): the slip-and-fall date you want to use
- Changing this date shifts the calculated deadline by the same amount (e.g., moving from March 1 to March 15 moves the deadline accordingly).
- Tolling/adjustment (if you’re modeling an extension): only if you have a fact pattern that supports it
- Adding tolling typically pushes the deadline later.
Output you should expect
The calculator output will generally include:
- Calculated deadline date (default 2-year SOL baseline)
- Breakdown of date math based on the start date(s) you entered
- (If available in the tool) an optional adjusted deadline if you model tolling/changes
Quick planning workflow (practical)
- Compute the default deadline using the incident date.
- Compare the deadline against real-world dates, like:
- when evidence was gathered,
- when injuries were diagnosed/documented,
- when notice (if any) was sent or required.
- If something supports tolling or a different start date, re-run the calculator with that adjustment to see how the deadline changes.
Warning: The safest approach is to work toward resolution and filing well before the calculated deadline. Date disputes, documentation delays, and procedural issues are common.
Related reading
- Choosing the right statute of limitations tool for Vermont — How to choose the right calculator
- Statute of limitations in Singapore: how to estimate the deadline — Full how-to guide with jurisdiction-specific rules
- Choosing the right statute of limitations tool for Connecticut — How to choose the right calculator
