Statute of Limitations for Legal Malpractice in Arizona
5 min read
Published March 22, 2026 • By DocketMath Team
Overview
In Arizona, legal malpractice claims are governed by a statute of limitations (SOL)—a deadline for filing a lawsuit. If you miss that deadline, the court will generally bar the claim, even if the underlying facts seem compelling.
DocketMath’s statute-of-limitations calculator helps you translate Arizona’s time rules into a concrete “last day to file” date based on the event date you choose (and, where applicable, the date you learned of the issue). This article focuses on Arizona’s general/default SOL period for claims framed as legal malpractice, using the statutory period reflected in A.R.S. § 13-107(A).
Note: This page is about the general/default deadline rule provided in the jurisdiction data. It does not identify a separate, claim-type-specific malpractice SOL because no such sub-rule was found in the provided data.
Limitation period
Default Arizona deadline (general rule)
The jurisdiction data specifies:
- General SOL Period: 2 years
- General Statute: **A.R.S. § 13-107(A)
In plain terms, the general rule is a 2-year window to bring the claim.
What date starts the clock?
Arizona’s SOL frameworks frequently involve a “trigger” date—often tied to when the alleged injury occurred and/or when the claimant discovered (or reasonably should have discovered) the problem. However, this specific page is constrained to the general/default period (2 years) and the general statute listed above.
To avoid building an incorrect timeline, DocketMath’s calculator is designed so you can:
- choose the event date you want to measure from, and
- optionally adjust based on discovery timing if your inputs reflect that fact pattern.
Because statute-of-limitations rules can be fact-sensitive, use the calculator as a planning tool—not as a substitute for case-specific legal analysis.
How the output changes with different inputs
Your calculator results will shift based on what you enter:
- If you enter an earlier event/knowledge date: the deadline will move earlier.
- If you enter a later event/knowledge date: the deadline will move later.
- If you switch the “measure-from” date in the calculator: you change the baseline from which the 2-year period is computed.
A practical way to use the tool:
- Identify the first date you can reasonably point to for when the issue occurred.
- Separately identify the first date you can reasonably point to for when you learned (or should have learned) the issue.
- Run both dates through DocketMath to see a range of potential deadlines.
- Treat the earlier deadline as a conservative target if you’re planning urgent next steps.
Key exceptions
No claim-type-specific sub-rule was found in the provided jurisdiction data, so this section does not list malpractice-specific exception categories (for example, special accrual rules tailored to professional negligence). Instead, here are the exceptions that commonly matter in SOL analysis, with a key limitation: this page does not confirm which exceptions apply to Arizona legal malpractice specifically, beyond the general SOL period stated.
Common exception categories to watch in Arizona SOL problems:
- Tolling (pauses or extends the limitations period due to particular circumstances)
- Accrual adjustments (when the clock starts, such as discovery-related triggers)
- Fraudulent concealment (when the defendant’s conduct prevents discovery of the claim)
- Incapacity (situations involving legal disability that may delay accrual or toll time)
Pitfall: assuming “2 years” is the whole story
Pitfall: A strict “2 years from the incident date” assumption can be wrong if the case law trigger is discovery-based, tolling applies, or a different accrual rule governs your facts. Even when the statutory period is 2 years, the start date can be the difference between a timely and an untimely filing.
If you’re evaluating deadlines, consider collecting the timeline documents that support your chosen trigger date:
- engagement agreement / scope of representation (where relevant)
- communications (emails, letters, filings)
- dates you learned facts connecting the conduct to harm
- dates of adverse outcomes (e.g., dismissal, judgment, missed deadlines)
These items don’t change the statute itself, but they make your chosen input date defensible.
Statute citation
The general/default period used in this page is:
- A.R.S. § 13-107(A)
- General SOL Period: 2 years
- Source (jurisdiction data reference): https://www.findlaw.com/state/arizona-law/arizona-criminal-statute-of-limitations-laws.html?utm_source=openai
Reminder: The jurisdiction data provided here explicitly states there was no claim-type-specific sub-rule found, so this page treats the 2-year period as the general/default deadline.
Use the calculator
You can calculate a deadline directly with DocketMath:
- Primary CTA: **Open the statute-of-limitations calculator
Inputs to consider
When you use the calculator, the key inputs typically are:
- Jurisdiction: Arizona (US-AZ)
- Base period: 2 years (per the jurisdiction data)
- Measure-from date: the date you choose as the trigger (event date and/or discovery/knowledge date)
Output you’ll get
After you enter your measure-from date(s), DocketMath will compute the end of the 2-year SOL window. If you run multiple dates, compare outcomes:
- Earlier calculated deadline: safer planning target
- Later calculated deadline: reflects a discovery/timing choice that may or may not match your facts
Quick “range” workflow (practical)
- Run the calculator using:
- Date A: when the underlying issue occurred (earliest plausible baseline)
- Date B: when you discovered the issue (later baseline)
- Pick the earlier deadline for decision-making.
Related reading
- Choosing the right statute of limitations tool for Vermont — Tool comparison
- Choosing the right statute of limitations tool for Connecticut — Tool comparison
