Statute of Limitations for Insurance Bad Faith in Michigan

6 min read

Published April 8, 2026 • By DocketMath Team

Overview

Run this scenario in DocketMath using the Statute Of Limitations calculator.

In Michigan, the statute of limitations (SOL) for a common insurance bad-faith lawsuit is 6 years under MCL § 767.24(1). This page uses that general/default period as the applicable timeline—no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found for insurance bad faith beyond the general framework described in Michigan law.

Bad-faith claims often arise after an insurer delays, underpays, or denies coverage despite obligations created by the policy and Michigan law. Practically, the key is timing: the SOL may depend on when the claim accrued (often tied to the insurer’s denial, underpayment, or similar actionable conduct). Because accrual and related timing issues can be fact-specific, it helps to track your dispute’s key dates early and model the deadline.

Use DocketMath’s statute-of-limitations calculator to convert your selected trigger/accrual date into a deadline checklist—so you’re not guessing about the calendar impact.

Note: This page is for general information about Michigan’s limitation period and how to plan dates. It is not legal advice. SOL questions can involve accrual details and fact-specific issues.

Limitation period

Michigan’s general limitation period is 6 years. The controlling statute referenced here is MCL § 767.24(1), which provides a general limitations framework that applies broadly for many claim categories.

What “6 years” means in practice

Think of the timeline as two steps:

  1. Choose a start concept (often accrual/trigger):
    Identify the date(s) that best represent when your bad-faith claim became actionable under your specific facts—for example, a denial date, an underpayment date, or another event you believe starts the limitations clock.

  2. Compute the end date:
    Add 6 years to the start/accrual date to estimate the deadline.

For planning, treat the calculated “last day” as a high-risk boundary. Build in time for preparation, internal review, and filing steps rather than waiting until the outer limit.

Inputs and how outputs change (DocketMath)

DocketMath’s statute-of-limitations tool is built to help you model how different start dates affect the final deadline. When you run it for Michigan, you’ll typically provide:

  • Jurisdiction: **US-MI (Michigan)
  • Trigger/accrual date: the date you believe the SOL clock starts
  • Rule selection (default framework): the tool will apply Michigan’s 6-year default period consistent with **MCL § 767.24(1)

How the output changes is straightforward:

  • If you enter a later trigger/accrual date, the calculated deadline shifts later.
  • If you enter an earlier trigger/accrual date, the calculated deadline shifts earlier—which is why “earliest plausible trigger” planning is often the safer approach.

Checklist for using the calculator effectively:

Key exceptions

The 6-year baseline under MCL § 767.24(1) does not necessarily operate the same way in every case. Even when the general period applies, the timing of when the clock starts, pauses, or is otherwise affected can change your deadline. Because insurance bad-faith scenarios vary, the practical approach is to look early for factors that could change accrual or the running of the period.

Common SOL issues to evaluate (fact-pattern based)

You may want to review whether any of the following appear in your timeline:

  • Accrual disputes:
    The parties may disagree on when the claim became actionable—e.g., when a denial became final, when an underpayment amount became fixed, or when communications effectively triggered the cause of action.

  • Tolling or pauses (clock-stopping effects):
    Some circumstances can affect whether and how quickly the limitations period runs.

  • Multiple bad-faith acts:
    If the insurer engaged in a sequence of conduct (e.g., repeated demands, partial payments, or repeated denials), you may need to decide which act (or set of facts) most closely defines the claim’s actionable trigger.

Pitfall: Selecting the “wrong” start date in your calculator run can yield a deadline that looks correct numerically but may be challenged if a court uses a different accrual date.

How to work exceptions into your deadline planning

Instead of betting everything on a single date, model a few plausible triggers and compare results using DocketMath:

  • Run 1: using the initial denial/decision date
  • Run 2: using the date you received the final determination
  • Run 3: using the date the underpayment amount became fixed (if that is the most defensible trigger in your facts)

Then plan using the earlier computed deadline as the “worst-case” planning point. This does not guarantee a court will adopt your position, but it helps you avoid missing a deadline due to uncertainty over accrual timing.

Statute citation

This page uses the general/default Michigan limitations framework:

  • MCL § 767.24(1)6-year general limitation period (Michigan Compiled Laws)

This is presented as the applicable timeline here because no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found for insurance bad faith beyond the general/default period. In other words, the baseline 6-year rule is the starting point for most deadline planning referenced on this page.

Use the calculator

Use DocketMath’s statute-of-limitations tool here:

  • /tools/statute-of-limitations

A practical Michigan bad-faith workflow:

  1. Choose jurisdiction: Select **US-MI (Michigan)
  2. Enter the trigger/accrual date: Use the date you believe starts the 6-year clock
  3. Use the applicable SOL rule: The tool will apply the 6-year default period under MCL § 767.24(1) for this Michigan general framework
  4. Review the output: Note the calculated SOL deadline date and compare it to your real-world filing plan

If accrual timing is uncertain, run multiple scenarios and treat the earliest calculated deadline as the safer internal planning target.

Warning: SOL deadlines can be sensitive to accrual and tolling arguments. Use the calculator to organize dates early—not to replace legal analysis.

Sources and references

Start with the primary authority for Michigan and confirm the effective date before relying on any output. If the rule has been amended, update the inputs and rerun the calculation.

Related reading