Statute of Limitations for False Arrest / False Imprisonment in Utah
6 min read
Published March 22, 2026 • By DocketMath Team
Overview
In Utah, claims described as false arrest or false imprisonment are generally governed by Utah’s general statute of limitations rule for civil actions. DocketMath’s statute-of-limitations calculator is designed to help you turn that rule into a usable deadline based on your key dates.
Note: Utah does not appear to have a separate, claim-type-specific limitations period for “false arrest/false imprisonment” in the statute rules most commonly cited for general limitations calculations. In other words, the default/general period applies unless a specific exception or another specialized statute clearly controls.
Because limitations deadlines are date-driven, small differences in facts—like when the incident ended or when the plaintiff learned of relevant facts—can change the outcome. This page explains Utah’s general limitations period, common exception concepts you should recognize, and how to use DocketMath to compute the end date from your timeline.
For additional Utah background on how the courts explain limitations periods, the Utah Courts website provides a general overview: https://www.utcourts.gov/en/legal-help/legal-help/procedures/statute-limitation.html.
Limitation period
Default (general) statute of limitations: 4 years
Utah’s general statute of limitations is 4 years under Utah Code § 76-1-302.
General SOL period: 4 years
General statute: Utah Code § 76-1-302
Jurisdiction: **Utah (US-UT)
How to map dates to the deadline (practical inputs)
In a statute-of-limitations calculator, the most useful inputs are usually:
- Event date (often the date of the arrest or confinement)
- Trigger date (the date the cause of action is considered to have accrued)
Because the exact accrual trigger can depend on case specifics, DocketMath’s calculator focuses on the commonly used default assumption: the limitations clock starts from the date the wrongful conduct occurred or ended in a way that makes the claim actionable.
Here’s how outputs typically change based on input timing:
- If your event date is earlier, your computed deadline will be earlier.
- If your event date is later, your computed deadline shifts later by the same amount of time.
- If an exception tolls (pauses) the period, the deadline may move later—but only if the tolling applies under Utah law to the facts.
Quick example (illustrative only)
If the relevant triggering date is January 15, 2024, then under a 4-year general period the deadline would be January 15, 2028 (subject to exceptions such as tolling).
Use DocketMath to run your actual dates through the calculator rather than estimating.
Key exceptions
Utah limitations law can involve exceptions that extend or alter the running of the clock. The most frequent “exception buckets” to look for include:
1) Tolling and disability concepts
Some statutes and doctrines pause limitations when a claimant cannot reasonably act due to a legal disability (for example, certain minors or other recognized conditions). Utah statutes and case law may define when tolling applies and for how long.
Warning: Tolling rules are highly fact-specific. If a statute requires proof of a particular condition (age, legal status, or a defined impairment), missing documentation or using the wrong dates can lead to an incorrect calculation.
2) Accrual timing disputes
Even when the limitations period is known (here, 4 years), the accrual date can be disputed. The questions commonly revolve around:
- when the confinement/arrest ended
- when the plaintiff knew or should have known key facts (depending on the claim framework)
- whether continuing conduct delays accrual
DocketMath can help you compare scenarios by changing the trigger date input and observing how the computed deadline shifts.
3) Other statutes that may override the general rule
Sometimes a specific Utah provision can apply to a particular category of claims and replace the general period. This page uses the default/general rule because no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found for false arrest/false imprisonment. Still, you should ensure no other statute governs the specific claim theory and remedy you are considering.
4) Practical litigation timing (not “legal advice,” but deadline risk)
Even if you have time on paper, filing logistics matter. Many deadlines are missed due to:
- filing close to the cutoff date
- delays in document preparation
- court processing time
A practical approach is to treat the computed end date as a “hard target” and plan to file earlier than the last day.
Checklist: exception signals to consider
Review your facts for these triggers:
Statute citation
Use this governing citation for the general limitations period in Utah:
- Utah Code § 76-1-302 — General statute of limitations: 4 years (Utah Courts summary and general guidance also reference limitations concepts): https://www.utcourts.gov/en/legal-help/legal-help/procedures/statute-limitation.html
Because the general rule is the default, your starting point for calculating deadlines in Utah should be the 4-year period unless a specific exception or a different statute clearly changes the analysis.
Use the calculator
DocketMath’s statute-of-limitations tool helps you compute a deadline by applying the general 4-year limitations period tied to Utah Code § 76-1-302.
Primary CTA: **/tools/statute-of-limitations
What to input
To generate an end date, you’ll typically provide:
- Jurisdiction: Utah (US-UT)
- Trigger date / accrual date: the date you believe the cause of action started running
- Optional: any additional date adjustments your tool asks for (such as whether you’re modeling an exception scenario)
How output changes when inputs change
Within the calculator:
- Changing the trigger date shifts the final deadline by the same time difference.
- Modeling a tolling/extension option (if the tool supports it) can push the deadline later.
- Entering an earlier trigger date usually produces a shorter window; entering a later trigger date increases the computed timeframe.
Suggested workflow (practical and low-friction)
- Start with the incident date (or the date the arrest/confinement ended—whichever best matches your accrual assumption).
- Run the calculation once to get a baseline deadline under the 4-year general rule.
- If you believe an exception applies, rerun using the adjusted trigger/tolling dates your facts support.
- Compare results and pick the most conservative deadline (earliest) for planning purposes.
Note: Even though DocketMath can compute dates, the correct legal trigger and whether an exception applies still depend on the specifics of the situation.
Related reading
- Choosing the right statute of limitations tool for Vermont — Tool comparison
- Choosing the right statute of limitations tool for Connecticut — Tool comparison
