Statute of Limitations for False Arrest / False Imprisonment in Texas

Statute of Limitations for False Arrest / False Imprisonment in Texas

5 min read

Published January 20, 2026 • Updated April 8, 2026 • By DocketMath Team

Article claim inventory in progress

Trust release 4

This page has legal or numeric text that still needs claim-level inventory before we can treat it as verified.

Overview

Run this scenario in DocketMath using the Statute Of Limitations calculator.

In Texas, the statute of limitations (SOL) for false arrest / false imprisonment is described in this page using the default limitations rule available in the provided jurisdiction data: Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Chapter 12. DocketMath’s “statute-of-limitations” calculator for US-TX is therefore configured to use the jurisdiction’s general/default period:

  • General SOL Period: 0.0833333333 years (about 1 month)
  • Claim-type-specific sub-rule for false arrest/false imprisonment: not found in the provided dataset → the calculator uses only the general/default period.

Important context (not legal advice): Texas false arrest/false imprisonment disputes are often handled through the civil process, and civil claims may be governed by a different SOL statute than criminal Chapter 12 rules. This page explains what the provided jurisdiction data feeds into DocketMath—not a guarantee that Chapter 12 is the correct framework for every fact pattern.

A practical way to approach SOL timing (whenever you’re evaluating a claim) is to answer two questions quickly:

  • When does the clock start? (the accrual/event date)
  • How long do you have? (the limitations length under the applicable rule)

This page focuses on the limitations length used by DocketMath for US-TX based on the provided general/default rule.

Limitation period

DocketMath’s Texas default limitations period (from the jurisdiction data) is:

  • 0.0833333333 years

Converted to days using a simple “SOL-year = 365 days” convention commonly used by calculators:

  • 0.0833333333 × 365 ≈ 30.4167 days
  • Practically, that’s roughly 30 days (≈ 1 month).

What 0.0833333333 years means for real deadlines

Because the figure is slightly over 30 days when converted from years, the deadline date you see in DocketMath can land a few days after a “month” depending on:

  • how the tool rounds (to the nearest day, floor/ceiling, etc.)
  • whether the limitations end date is treated as inclusive/exclusive of the start date
  • date/time handling in the calculator

How the output changes when the start date changes

The calculator’s deadline is typically driven by:

  • Input: your selected start/accrual/event date
  • Output: start date + SOL period, subject to rounding rules

So if you choose a later accrual date (for example, using the date of release instead of the date of arrest), the estimated deadline generally moves later by a comparable amount.

Checklist for reliable inputs

Common pitfall: using a “reporting” or “contacted an attorney” date instead of the event/accrual date. The SOL clock may already be running from the earlier event date.

Key exceptions

Based on the jurisdiction data you supplied, no false arrest/false imprisonment claim-type-specific exception rules were included. That means this page cannot point to a dedicated “exception” (for example, a specialized tolling or modified accrual rule) from Chapter 12 that is explicitly tied to false arrest/false imprisonment within the provided dataset.

However, SOL outcomes often change due to broad categories that may or may not apply depending on facts and the correct governing statute:

Categories to verify (before relying on a short default SOL)

  • Tolling (pause of the clock): Some circumstances can stop the SOL from running (but this depends on the specific statute/doctrine).
  • Accrual rules (when the clock starts): Some claims accrue on a different date than the event itself.
  • Wrong category/proceeding: Criminal SOL rules and civil tort SOL rules can differ substantially.
  • Remedy/procedure differences: The legal route you choose (civil lawsuit vs. criminal procedure vs. administrative process) can change the limitations framework.

Caution: The 0.0833333333 years default is unusually short (about 1 month). If you’re planning litigation timing for a false arrest/false imprisonment dispute, double-check whether the claim is actually governed by the criminal Chapter 12 framework used by this dataset, or by a Texas civil limitations statute.

Practical takeaway for using DocketMath

Treat the DocketMath result here as a baseline estimate driven by the provided general/default SOL rule. If your situation involves tolling, alternative accrual, or a civil framework, the true deadline could differ—and that difference would come from rules not included in the provided jurisdiction data.

Statute citation

This page’s DocketMath configuration points to:

Dataset facts applied in this page

  • General SOL Period: 0.0833333333 years
  • Claim-type-specific rule for false arrest/false imprisonment: not found → using the general/default period

Because this content is based strictly on the provided dataset, it does not add civil tort SOL statutes that may govern false arrest/false imprisonment claims in a civil lawsuit.

Use the calculator

Use DocketMath to convert the SOL period into an estimated deadline date.

Primary CTA: /tools/statute-of-limitations

Inputs to enter in DocketMath (and why)

In general, a statute-of-limitations calculator will want:

  • Start/accrual date: the date you believe the clock began
  • Jurisdiction: US-TX
  • Rule selection: default/general rule, since no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found in the provided dataset

Output you’ll get

The calculator will estimate a deadline using:

  • SOL period: 0.0833333333 years (≈ 30 days)
  • Tool-specific rounding/date math applied to your chosen start date

Quick “what-if” testing

If more than one event date could be relevant, run scenarios:

Then compare A/B/C to see which candidate date yields the earliest (most conservative) deadline.

Note: DocketMath can help you model timelines quickly, but it’s not a substitute for confirming the correct governing statute and accrual/tolling rules for your specific facts.

Related reading