Statute of Limitations for False Arrest / False Imprisonment in Texas

5 min read

Published April 8, 2026 • By DocketMath Team

Overview

Run this scenario in DocketMath using the Statute Of Limitations calculator.

In Texas, the statute of limitations (SOL) for false arrest / false imprisonment is described in this page using the default limitations rule available in the provided jurisdiction data: Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Chapter 12. DocketMath’s “statute-of-limitations” calculator for US-TX is therefore configured to use the jurisdiction’s general/default period:

  • General SOL Period: 0.0833333333 years (about 1 month)
  • Claim-type-specific sub-rule for false arrest/false imprisonment: not found in the provided dataset → the calculator uses only the general/default period.

Important context (not legal advice): Texas false arrest/false imprisonment disputes are often handled through the civil process, and civil claims may be governed by a different SOL statute than criminal Chapter 12 rules. This page explains what the provided jurisdiction data feeds into DocketMath—not a guarantee that Chapter 12 is the correct framework for every fact pattern.

A practical way to approach SOL timing (whenever you’re evaluating a claim) is to answer two questions quickly:

  • When does the clock start? (the accrual/event date)
  • How long do you have? (the limitations length under the applicable rule)

This page focuses on the limitations length used by DocketMath for US-TX based on the provided general/default rule.

Limitation period

DocketMath’s Texas default limitations period (from the jurisdiction data) is:

  • 0.0833333333 years

Converted to days using a simple “SOL-year = 365 days” convention commonly used by calculators:

  • 0.0833333333 × 365 ≈ 30.4167 days
  • Practically, that’s roughly 30 days (≈ 1 month).

What 0.0833333333 years means for real deadlines

Because the figure is slightly over 30 days when converted from years, the deadline date you see in DocketMath can land a few days after a “month” depending on:

  • how the tool rounds (to the nearest day, floor/ceiling, etc.)
  • whether the limitations end date is treated as inclusive/exclusive of the start date
  • date/time handling in the calculator

How the output changes when the start date changes

The calculator’s deadline is typically driven by:

  • Input: your selected start/accrual/event date
  • Output: start date + SOL period, subject to rounding rules

So if you choose a later accrual date (for example, using the date of release instead of the date of arrest), the estimated deadline generally moves later by a comparable amount.

Checklist for reliable inputs

Common pitfall: using a “reporting” or “contacted an attorney” date instead of the event/accrual date. The SOL clock may already be running from the earlier event date.

Key exceptions

Based on the jurisdiction data you supplied, no false arrest/false imprisonment claim-type-specific exception rules were included. That means this page cannot point to a dedicated “exception” (for example, a specialized tolling or modified accrual rule) from Chapter 12 that is explicitly tied to false arrest/false imprisonment within the provided dataset.

However, SOL outcomes often change due to broad categories that may or may not apply depending on facts and the correct governing statute:

Categories to verify (before relying on a short default SOL)

  • Tolling (pause of the clock): Some circumstances can stop the SOL from running (but this depends on the specific statute/doctrine).
  • Accrual rules (when the clock starts): Some claims accrue on a different date than the event itself.
  • Wrong category/proceeding: Criminal SOL rules and civil tort SOL rules can differ substantially.
  • Remedy/procedure differences: The legal route you choose (civil lawsuit vs. criminal procedure vs. administrative process) can change the limitations framework.

Caution: The 0.0833333333 years default is unusually short (about 1 month). If you’re planning litigation timing for a false arrest/false imprisonment dispute, double-check whether the claim is actually governed by the criminal Chapter 12 framework used by this dataset, or by a Texas civil limitations statute.

Practical takeaway for using DocketMath

Treat the DocketMath result here as a baseline estimate driven by the provided general/default SOL rule. If your situation involves tolling, alternative accrual, or a civil framework, the true deadline could differ—and that difference would come from rules not included in the provided jurisdiction data.

Statute citation

This page’s DocketMath configuration points to:

Dataset facts applied in this page

  • General SOL Period: 0.0833333333 years
  • Claim-type-specific rule for false arrest/false imprisonment: not found → using the general/default period

Because this content is based strictly on the provided dataset, it does not add civil tort SOL statutes that may govern false arrest/false imprisonment claims in a civil lawsuit.

Use the calculator

Use DocketMath to convert the SOL period into an estimated deadline date.

Primary CTA: /tools/statute-of-limitations

Inputs to enter in DocketMath (and why)

In general, a statute-of-limitations calculator will want:

  • Start/accrual date: the date you believe the clock began
  • Jurisdiction: US-TX
  • Rule selection: default/general rule, since no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found in the provided dataset

Output you’ll get

The calculator will estimate a deadline using:

  • SOL period: 0.0833333333 years (≈ 30 days)
  • Tool-specific rounding/date math applied to your chosen start date

Quick “what-if” testing

If more than one event date could be relevant, run scenarios:

Then compare A/B/C to see which candidate date yields the earliest (most conservative) deadline.

Note: DocketMath can help you model timelines quickly, but it’s not a substitute for confirming the correct governing statute and accrual/tolling rules for your specific facts.

Related reading