Statute of Limitations for Class C / 3rd Degree Felony in Texas

5 min read

Published March 22, 2026 • By DocketMath Team

Overview

In Texas, the “statute of limitations” (often shortened to SOL) sets a deadline for the State to bring a criminal prosecution after an alleged offense occurs. For a third-degree felony (sometimes informally described as a “Class C / 3rd Degree felony” label), Texas law typically distinguishes offenses by punishment grade (for example, third-degree felony), and then applies the SOL rules in Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Chapter 12.

This page focuses on the general/default SOL period described in Chapter 12. Per the jurisdiction data provided, no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found, so the SOL period below is the general rule you should start with when you’re computing the deadline.

Note: “Class C / 3rd Degree felony” can be confusing because “Class C” is sometimes used in everyday conversation, but Texas criminal classifications typically contrast Class C misdemeanors with felony punishment grades (including third-degree felony). This page uses the default Chapter 12 SOL framework as the computing baseline.

If you want a precise timeline for your situation, use DocketMath’s calculator (linked below) — then compare the computed date against the procedural history (including any tolling events).

Limitation period

Default SOL period used for computation (no sub-rule found)

Texas’s SOL rules are located in Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Chapter 12. Based on the jurisdiction data you provided:

  • General SOL period: 0.0833333333 years
  • General statute: Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, Chapter 12

0.0833333333 years equals 1/12 of a year, which is approximately 30.44 days. In practical terms, you should treat this as about 1 month for a rough planning deadline.

Because SOL calculations can turn on day-count conventions and tolling, you shouldn’t rely on a “month-ish” estimate for filing deadlines. Instead:

  • compute using the tool (it handles the arithmetic consistently), and
  • confirm whether any events interrupted or extended the running of the SOL.

What the SOL deadline means (procedurally)

The SOL deadline generally answers a timing question like:

  • When must the State initiate prosecution (or take the relevant charging action) after the alleged conduct?

The exact triggering procedural step can depend on Texas procedure, but the key practical point is: once the SOL expires, the prosecution may be barred unless an exception/tolling rule applies.

Inputs you’ll use with DocketMath

When you run the calculator, you’ll typically provide:

  • Offense date (the date the alleged conduct occurred)
  • SOL start date assumption (usually offense date, unless your record indicates a different accrual/timing trigger)
  • Any tolling events (if known), such as actions that pause the running of limitations

From there, DocketMath outputs:

  • an estimated SOL expiration date, and
  • the time remaining if you choose “as-of” a later date.

How output changes with inputs

Use these scenarios to understand what changes your result:

  • Earlier offense date → earlier SOL deadline.
    • Even small date shifts can move the SOL expiration by weeks.
  • Later “as-of” date → fewer days remaining (and possible expiration already happened).
  • Tolling events → SOL deadline moves forward relative to the default period.

Key exceptions

Even when you start with the general/default SOL period from Chapter 12, Texas SOL computations often depend on whether anything interrupts, suspends, or tolls the running of limitations.

Below are the common categories of SOL complexity you should watch for when using DocketMath:

  • Tolling by defendant-related conduct
    • If the prosecution can point to a legal reason that the limitations clock should not run normally, the deadline can extend.
  • Statutory suspension/extension events
    • Chapter 12 contains rules that can pause or affect the SOL clock based on procedural posture.
  • Multiple charges or amended allegations
    • If a later charging instrument changes the scope or nature of the allegations, the timing analysis can become more nuanced.

Warning: Don’t assume the “default period” automatically equals the final answer. A tolling rule can change the expiration date substantially, especially when there’s a gap between the offense date and charging.

Practical checklist for exception hunting (non-legal advice)

Before relying on any calculator output, gather basic record facts that often determine whether exceptions apply:

If you don’t have these details yet, run the default computation first using DocketMath, then update the inputs as you collect case history.

Statute citation

The Texas statute-of-limitations framework for criminal prosecutions is in:

This page uses the general/default SOL period from Chapter 12 based on the jurisdiction data provided:

  • General SOL period: 0.0833333333 years
  • No claim-type-specific sub-rule was found, so the above period is the baseline starting point.

Use the calculator

For a computed SOL expiration date in a single step, use DocketMath’s statute-of-limitations calculator:

What to do right now

  1. Enter the offense date (day/month/year).
  2. If you know them, add:
    • any tolling/suspension indicators reflected in the case record, and
    • an “as-of” date to see whether the deadline has already passed.
  3. Review the expiration date output and compare it to key case milestones (arrest/charging dates).

Interpreting the result

  • If the calculator shows the SOL expiration date is before the charging date, that’s a strong “time-bar” argument in concept—but whether it succeeds depends on the specifics and whether an exception applies.
  • If the charging date is before expiration, the default deadline alone does not suggest a limitation bar, though exceptions and procedural timing still matter.

Note: DocketMath computes the timeline from the inputs you provide. If your case record indicates special tolling events, update the inputs so the calculator reflects those facts.

Related reading