Statute of Limitations for Child Sexual Abuse / Assault in Wyoming

6 min read

Published March 22, 2026 • By DocketMath Team

Overview

Wyoming law sets deadlines for filing claims involving child sexual abuse or child sexual assault. In legal timelines, these deadlines usually come from Wyoming’s general statute of limitations statute for civil actions (and separate provisions for certain crimes). This post focuses on the statute of limitations period tied to child sexual abuse/assault as captured by Wyo. Stat. § 1-3-105(a)(iv)(C) and related provisions reflected in Wyoming’s limitations framework.

DocketMath’s statute-of-limitations calculator helps you translate those rules into a concrete “earliest filing date” or “latest filing date” based on facts like key dates. You can use it whether you’re tracking a case for claim planning, document workflows, or deadline triage.

Note: This page explains Wyoming’s limitations rules and how to use DocketMath. It is not legal advice and cannot account for every procedural nuance, such as tolling disputes or how a specific claim is categorized.

Limitation period

For child sexual abuse/assault in Wyoming, the statute of limitations period is 4 years under:

  • Wyo. Stat. § 1-3-105(a)(iv)(C) (shown in the jurisdiction data as the governing 4-year rule for this scenario)

That “4 years” timeline is what most people mean when they ask “What’s the SOL for child sexual abuse/assault in Wyoming?” In practice, though, the calculation can depend on which date is treated as starting the clock, and whether an exception applies.

How DocketMath calculates timelines (inputs that change outputs)

When you use DocketMath’s /tools/statute-of-limitations tool, your inputs typically change the result in two ways:

  1. The start date (the event date or another legally relevant triggering date).
  2. The exception choice (whether the action is treated under a specific exception lane that changes the analysis, even if the base period is still 4 years).

To make the tool’s output more predictable, gather:

  • The date of the alleged abuse/assault (or the date most relevant to your fact pattern).
  • The date you’re considering filing (or the target deadline you’re trying to avoid).
  • Any relevant information that could affect exception selection (for example, facts that might align your claim to an exception category).

Practical deadline framing

A “4-year SOL” can mean very different operational deadlines depending on when the clock starts. For example:

  • If the clock starts on 2019-06-15, a strict “add 4 years” approach points to no later than 2023-06-15 (subject to exceptions or procedural rules).
  • If the clock starts later due to an exception or triggering-date rule, the “latest filing date” shifts accordingly.

DocketMath is designed to help you see that shift quickly, rather than doing repeated manual date math.

Key exceptions

Wyoming’s limitations framework includes multiple provision references in the same 4-year range for related categories or exception pathways. Based on your Wyoming jurisdiction data, the following are flagged as 4-year exception-related items:

  • Wyo. Stat. § 1-3-105(a)(iv)(C)4 yearsexception M1
  • Wyo. Stat. § 1-3-1054 yearsexception M3
  • Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-1014 yearsexception N1
  • null — 4 yearsexception P1

Even when multiple provisions share the same headline duration (4 years), they can differ in how the rule applies. Operationally, you should treat “exception lane” selection as a core part of the calculation.

Checklist for choosing the right exception lane in DocketMath

Use the following checklist before you run calculations:

Warning: The biggest real-world risk is applying the correct duration (4 years) to the wrong subsection or starting trigger date. That mismatch can produce a timeline that looks “accurate” on duration but fails on the legal trigger.

Statute citation

Wyoming’s statute and the specific subsection used for the 4-year child sexual abuse/assault limitation period is:

  • Wyo. Stat. § 1-3-105(a)(iv)(C)4 years (as reflected in Wyoming’s limitations framework; Source: Wyoming Legislature, wyoleg.gov)

Additional references included in your jurisdiction data (each marked with a 4-year label) include:

  • Wyo. Stat. § 1-3-1054 years (exception M3)
  • Wyo. Stat. § 6-2-1014 years (exception N1)

These citations are the backbone of what the DocketMath statute-of-limitations calculator operationalizes for Wyoming.

Use the calculator

DocketMath’s statute-of-limitations tool is the fastest way to turn dates and exception options into a clear output you can work from.

Go to the tool

Use this primary CTA: **/tools/statute-of-limitations

You can also jump directly from the calculator workflow via internal navigation if you’re comparing jurisdictions or scenarios. For example, you can start with: /tools/statute-of-limitations and adjust inputs as you gather facts.

Inputs to enter

Typically, your workflow looks like this:

  1. Choose Wyoming (US-WY).
  2. Enter the start date you believe controls the timeline (e.g., the relevant event date or triggering date for the limitations period).
  3. Enter the “as of” date (or the date you’re considering filing) to see whether the period has run.
  4. Select the relevant exception lane if your scenario matches one of the tracked pathways (for example, the calculator’s exception labels corresponding to the provisions listed above).

Output to expect

DocketMath’s output generally helps you answer:

  • What is the latest filing date under the selected rule/exception?
  • Given your dates, is the action still within the limitations period or past the deadline?

If you update the start date by even a few months, you’ll see the deadline shift—use that feature to test different fact assumptions and confirm which input drives the result most.

Pitfall: Don’t run one calculation and stop. Run at least two scenarios—(1) the earliest plausible start date and (2) the latest plausible start date—to understand the range of “deadline risk.”

Sources and references

Start with the primary authority for Wyoming and confirm the effective date before relying on any output. If the rule has been amended, update the inputs and rerun the calculation.

Related reading