Statute of Limitations for Assault and Battery (intentional tort) in Kentucky
5 min read
Published April 8, 2026 • By DocketMath Team
Overview
In Kentucky, the statute of limitations (SOL) for an intentional tort claim such as assault and battery is 5 years, using Kentucky’s general limitations rule in KRS 500.020.
As a practical matter, you normally start by checking whether Kentucky has a claim-type-specific SOL for assault and battery. In this reference-page context, no assault/battery-specific sub-rule was found, so the general/default 5-year period is the baseline for most timing calculations.
Note: This “default” 5-year rule is a useful starting point, but the effective deadline can change if the claim is pled under a different legal theory (for example, a statutory cause of action with its own SOL) or if tolling applies.
Limitation period
Kentucky’s general SOL for applicable civil actions is 5 years under KRS 500.020. The most important practical question is: when does the clock start for your specific allegations? The deadline you calculate will be driven by the trigger date you use.
What DocketMath uses as inputs
When you use DocketMath’s statute-of-limitations calculator, you’ll typically provide:
- Date of the alleged assault/battery (or the date of the last relevant act you’re relying on)
- Confirmation that you’re working with a civil limitations-period timeline (the calculator is focused on limitations timing, not liability)
- Optional inputs (if your scenario supports them) for tolling/delayed accrual adjustments
How the output changes
Because SOLs measure time from a trigger event, your output will shift when your inputs change:
- Earlier incident date → earlier deadline date
- Later incident date → later deadline date
- Tolling/delayed accrual inputs included → deadline may shift forward depending on the adjustment
Here’s a simple illustration using the 5-year baseline (not legal advice—just a timing example):
- If the last alleged act occurred on January 15, 2021, a straightforward 5-year clock would point to a deadline around January 15, 2026 (the exact end-date can vary based on how time is counted for filings).
Common timing pitfalls to watch
Most SOL problems come from using the wrong start date.
- Last act vs. first act: If there are multiple incidents, the last relevant act date may control for a conservative “latest-possible” deadline.
- Continuing conduct / ongoing effects: If allegations span multiple dates, courts may treat the accrual trigger differently depending on the claims and facts.
- Accrual arguments and framing: Even if KRS 500.020 sets the general period, the practical accrual date can depend on how the claim is pleaded.
Pitfall: If your complaint is based primarily on a later incident but you enter the first incident date as the trigger, your deadline calculation may be earlier than the one that best matches the pleaded theory.
Key exceptions
While the baseline period is 5 years under KRS 500.020, exceptions or related doctrines may affect the effective deadline. Because this page is intended to cover the general/default rule for assault and battery timing, treat the items below as checkpoints before relying on a plain 5-year schedule.
1) Claims governed by a different (specific) statute
Even with KRS 500.020 as a starting point, some causes of action may be subject to different SOL periods if they are brought under statutory schemes rather than a common-law intentional tort theory.
Quick checklist:
2) Tolling or delayed accrual
The “clock” may be paused or start later in some circumstances. Tolling concepts and accrual rules can be highly fact- and pleading-dependent.
In practice, the safest approach is:
- confirm the accrual trigger you are using (i.e., what event starts the clock in your scenario), and
- use the calculator inputs that match that trigger and any tolling facts you’re asserting.
3) Multiple incidents or continuing effects
When allegations involve more than one date, the SOL deadline may track the latest operative date (depending on how the claim is pleaded and what is legally considered the accrual event).
Quick method:
Warning: The calculator can only reflect the dates you enter. If the case involves multiple incidents, confirm which date is actually intended to drive the limitations analysis for your claim.
Statute citation
KRS 500.020 (Kentucky general limitations rule; 5-year default).
This reference-page uses KRS 500.020 as the governing statute because no assault-and-battery-specific SOL sub-rule was identified here. Accordingly, the 5-year period should be treated as the general/default timeframe for civil assault and battery claims unless a specific rule or tolling doctrine applies.
Use the calculator
Use DocketMath to convert the KRS 500.020 5-year baseline into a practical deadline based on your trigger date(s). The primary goal is to calendar an SOL deadline you can track.
Start here:
What to do in the calculator (practical workflow)
- Enter your trigger date
- Choose the date tied to the last alleged act you plan to rely on for the intentional tort claim (for conservative planning when multiple dates are involved).
- Select the jurisdiction
- Confirm US-KY / Kentucky.
- Review the computed deadline
- The result should reflect 5 years from your trigger date, and it may shift if you include any tolling/delayed accrual inputs supported by the calculator for your scenario.
Input/output checklist
If your deadline looks close, consider acting quickly—SOL deadlines can be unforgiving.
Sources and references
Start with the primary authority for Kentucky and confirm the effective date before relying on any output. If the rule has been amended, update the inputs and rerun the calculation.
Related reading
- Choosing the right statute of limitations tool for Vermont — How to choose the right calculator
- Statute of limitations in Singapore: how to estimate the deadline — Full how-to guide with jurisdiction-specific rules
- Choosing the right statute of limitations tool for Connecticut — How to choose the right calculator
