Statute of limitations for sexual assault in Minnesota

Statute of limitations for sexual assault in Minnesota

5 min read

Published March 26, 2026 • Updated April 23, 2026 • By DocketMath Team

Article claim inventory in progress

Trust release 4

This page has legal or numeric text that still needs claim-level inventory before we can treat it as verified.

Rule or statute summary

In Minnesota, the statute of limitations (SOL) for sexual-assault prosecutions is generally analyzed using the state’s criminal limitations framework—with the key baseline rule located at Minnesota Statutes § 628.26.

The governing rule defines when the clock starts, how long it runs, and which exceptions apply. For Minnesota, use the citation below as the baseline and document any carve-outs that apply to your matter.

Default rule (no claim-type-specific sub-rule found)

For this guide, no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found that would override the general default period for sexual assault. That means the default starting point is the general SOL described below:

  • General SOL period: 3 years
  • General statute: Minnesota Statutes § 628.26

In other words, unless you identify a separate statutory exception that applies to the particular situation, you should begin by treating the SOL as 3 years from the relevant start date the statute uses.

What DocketMath is designed to do (and what it doesn’t)

DocketMath’s “statute-of-limitations” calculator turns the rule into a practical deadline you can place on a timeline. It is most useful for:

  • estimating when an SOL would expire under the general default period, and
  • comparing that estimated expiration date to a filing/charging date you may have in mind.

Gentle disclaimer: SOL application can be affected by case-specific factors and by statutory provisions beyond the general default (for example, procedural events or other exceptions). This article is intended to support planning and timeline awareness—not legal advice or strategy.

Citations

The general criminal SOL rule referenced in this Minnesota overview is:

  • Minn. Stat. § 628.26 — the general statute of limitations, including a 3-year default period for certain offenses.

This draft is intentionally written around the brief’s provided jurisdiction data: 3 years as the general/default period and § 628.26 as the governing general statute. Because the brief notes that no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found, the content treats § 628.26’s general rule as the baseline.

Use the calculator

Use DocketMath to compute the practical deadline for the general 3-year limitations period tied to Minn. Stat. § 628.26.

Run the Statute Of Limitations calculation in DocketMath, then save the output so it can be audited later: Open the calculator.

Primary CTA

Use DocketMath here: /tools/statute-of-limitations

Inputs to enter

Because this guide is using the general/default 3-year SOL, the key input is the start date—commonly the date of the alleged conduct. Depending on the calculator’s interface, the field might be labeled something like:

  • Start date (often the incident/offense date)

In planning terms, your goal is to identify the date that functions as the SOL “start point” for the scenario you’re modeling (frequently the offense/incident date when using the general rule).

What the calculator will output

Given a 3-year general period, the calculator should produce an SOL expiration date based on:

  • SOL expiration date = start date + 3 years

Some calculators may also show intermediate or related dates—follow the on-screen labels provided by DocketMath for the exact output formatting.

How outputs change when inputs change

To make the timeline usable, it helps to think in terms of “what moves the deadline.”

  • If the start date moves forward by 30 days: the calculated SOL expiration date typically shifts forward by about 30 days as well.
  • If you correct the start date (for example, choosing an earlier incident date within a range): the SOL deadline would likely move earlier, which can matter a lot when you compare to the actual charging or filing timeline.
  • If you’re unsure which date is the correct start point: try modeling each plausible candidate date using the calculator, then compare results to the real-world procedural dates you have (like the charging date).

Quick timeline example (general default)

Assume the scenario uses the general default 3-year period and the offense/incident date is:

  • Start date: January 10, 2020
  • General SOL period: 3 years (Minn. Stat. § 628.26)

Then the estimated:

  • SOL expiration date: January 10, 2023

If you know the filing/charging date, compare it to the calculator’s SOL expiration date to see whether the charge would fall before or after the estimated deadline under the general default rule.

Pitfall to avoid: Don’t assume every timing question is the same across civil vs. criminal contexts. This summary focuses on the criminal general SOL framework described by § 628.26 and the provided 3-year default.

Sources and references

Start with the primary authority for Minnesota and confirm the effective date before relying on any output. If the rule has been amended, update the inputs and rerun the calculation.

Related reading