How to run Settlement Allocator in DocketMath for Wyoming
6 min read
Published December 30, 2025 • Updated April 23, 2026 • By DocketMath Team
Trust release 4
This page has legal or numeric text that still needs claim-level inventory before we can treat it as verified.
Step-by-step
Below is a practical way to run Settlement Allocator in DocketMath for Wyoming (US-WY) using jurisdiction-aware rules and Wyoming’s general/default statute of limitations (SOL) period.
Quick note: This is a workflow for using the tool and its outputs. It’s not legal advice. If you’re applying this to a real matter, consider confirming details with a qualified professional.
1) Open the Settlement Allocator tool
Start here: **/tools/settlement-allocator
If you’re already in DocketMath, navigate to the calculator named Settlement Allocator and ensure the calculator ID matches settlement-allocator.
2) Confirm the jurisdiction setting: US-WY
In the calculator’s jurisdiction selector (or jurisdiction-aware mode), select:
- Jurisdiction: Wyoming
- Code: US-WY
This selection is important because DocketMath uses jurisdiction-aware logic to compute eligibility/timing windows and to influence allocation behavior.
3) Use Wyoming’s default SOL period (and be clear about “default”)
For Wyoming, the general/default SOL period is:
- 4 years
- General Statute: **Wyo. Stat. § 1-3-105(a)(iv)(C)
- Source: https://www.wyoleg.gov/
Per your jurisdiction notes, no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found to override this general/default period. That means, within this setup, the tool should treat 4 years as the limitation window used for eligibility logic.
What this means in practice in DocketMath:
- DocketMath will apply 4 years as the starting point for limitation calculations.
- If your situation involves a specialized cause of action with a different limitations provision, that rule could control in the real world—but based on the dataset available for this guide, there wasn’t a claim-type-specific override identified.
So, in this workflow, the “expected” behavior is: inputs fall into or out of the 4-year window, and the allocation output will react accordingly.
4) Enter the case inputs the calculator requests
Settlement Allocator typically asks for timing inputs and settlement amounts. The exact labels can vary slightly by UI, but they usually include categories like:
- Relevant date (the limitation “anchor”)
- Example: occurrence/accrual date, or a trigger date—use the date that DocketMath labels as the limitation-relevant field.
- Other key dates
- Example: demand date, settlement agreement date, cutoff date, etc.—match each value to the label shown.
- **Settlement amount(s)
- Total settlement and/or line-item amounts (depending on whether the tool supports multiple buckets).
- Allocation inputs
- Any weights, category totals, or distributions DocketMath requests.
Tips for clean input:
- If the UI expects dollars without commas, enter values in the format it accepts (e.g., 250000 rather than 250,000).
- Use the tool’s date picker when possible, or use the exact date format the UI provides (often YYYY-MM-DD).
- Keep the “relevant date” concept straight—this is the date most likely to drive SOL eligibility.
5) Check the computed eligibility/timing window
After inputs are entered, DocketMath computes the SOL-related logic using Wyoming’s jurisdiction-aware default:
- SOL length: 4 years
- Citation basis: **Wyo. Stat. § 1-3-105(a)(iv)(C)
At this stage, review any intermediate output or flags the tool shows, such as:
- whether the scenario appears within the limitation window
- whether it appears outside the limitation window
- whether any allocations are reduced, zeroed out, or adjusted due to timing logic
If results are surprising:
- The “relevant date” selection is often the first thing to revisit.
- Timing-threshold calculations are frequently sensitive to boundary handling (how “in the window” is determined).
6) Run the allocation and review output breakdowns
Click Calculate (or the equivalent button). DocketMath will generate a settlement allocation breakdown.
When you review results, focus on:
- Allocation buckets/categories (how totals are distributed)
- Any SOL/timing flags or adjustments
- Totals validation
- confirm whether the allocated sum matches your entered settlement amount (within the tool’s rounding rules)
Sanity checks that help:
- Does the output’s total allocation equal the settlement total you entered?
- Are the largest buckets aligned with your input weights/categories?
- Did any buckets become 0 due to SOL/timing eligibility?
7) Adjust inputs deliberately and re-run
To understand what drives the outcome, change inputs in a controlled order rather than editing everything at once.
A good iteration sequence:
- Adjust only the relevant date → re-run.
- If the outcome shifts as expected (e.g., within/outside), keep that change.
- Adjust amounts or weights → re-run.
- Finally, refine secondary dates (demand/cutoff/etc.) if the tool uses them.
This approach helps you identify exactly which input causes allocation changes.
Common pitfalls
Even with a straightforward 4-year default, these issues commonly cause confusion or unexpected outputs:
The calculator’s SOL eligibility depends on the date DocketMath labels as the limitation anchor. If you enter a different date than the tool expects, allocations can change dramatically.
Your jurisdiction notes indicate no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found. In this guide’s setup, DocketMath should use the general/default 4-year period based on Wyo. Stat. § 1-3-105(a)(iv)(C).
If a specific cause of action truly has a different limitations provision, that could be outside what this “default setup” represents.
Four years can be a near-threshold scenario. If results look “almost” correct, try small date adjustments (such as moving the relevant date by a day or a week) to see how the calculator treats eligibility boundaries.
Enter amounts in the units the UI requests. For example, entering 250 instead of 250000 may still produce internally consistent totals while making the results meaningless for your intended settlement figure.
Changing dates and amounts simultaneously makes it harder to attribute changes to a specific cause. Use one change at a time—timing first, then amounts/weights.
Try it
You can run a Wyoming scenario directly in DocketMath:
- Go to **/tools/settlement-allocator
- Set **Jurisdiction: Wyoming (US-WY)
- Enter your dates and settlement amount(s)
- Confirm the tool is applying the 4-year general/default SOL under **Wyo. Stat. § 1-3-105(a)(iv)(C)
Before clicking Calculate, use this checklist:
Optional sensitivity test (useful for learning the tool):
- Run the calculator twice:
- with the relevant date as entered
- with the relevant date moved slightly (e.g., a week)
Then compare which allocation buckets change—this helps you confirm that timing logic is driving the distribution.
