Worked example: Closing Cost in Minnesota
5 min read
Published April 15, 2026 • By DocketMath Team
Example inputs
This worked example shows how DocketMath calculates a closing cost in Minnesota (US-MN) using jurisdiction-aware rules and a 3-year default general statute of limitations (SOL). It’s designed for practicality—so you can see exactly which inputs drive the output.
Note: This example uses Minnesota’s general/default SOL. The provided jurisdiction data indicates no claim-type-specific sub-rule was found, so the calculation applies the general period described below rather than a special shorter/longer one.
Core jurisdiction rule used (Minnesota)
- General SOL period: 3 years
- General Statute: Minnesota Statutes § 628.26
(general SOL period for this example model) - Source context (reference): https://minnesotacourtrecords.us/criminal-court-records/gross-misdemeanor/
Calculator used
- DocketMath calculator:
/tools/closing-cost - Primary CTA:
/tools/closing-cost
Inputs (what you’d enter into DocketMath)
Because “closing cost” can be modeled differently depending on how an organization defines it, this example uses a common DocketMath-style structure: the cost output is driven by time remaining to a SOL-driven closing point and a daily holding cost rate, plus a one-time closing/processing fee.
Use these example inputs for Minnesota:
- Jurisdiction: US-MN (Minnesota)
- Filing date (start date): 2023-01-15
- Current date (calculation date): 2026-01-10
- Daily holding cost rate: $45/day
- One-time closing/processing fee: $600
You can sanity-check the date math before running the tool:
- Start (filing) → 2023-01-15
- Current date → 2026-01-10
- Time elapsed: nearly 3 years, but not quite the full 3-year general SOL window (because it’s 5 days short).
Quick timeline (so the output makes intuitive sense)
| Item | Date | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Filing date | 2023-01-15 | Start of the SOL clock in this example model |
| General SOL duration | +3 years | Uses Minn. Stat. § 628.26 as the default period (no special sub-rule found in the provided data) |
| SOL end date | 2026-01-15 | Date the 3-year period completes |
| Current date | 2026-01-10 | Calculation happens 5 days before SOL end |
Example run
Now run DocketMath with the inputs above using the Minnesota rule for a 3-year general/default SOL under Minn. Stat. § 628.26.
Run the Closing Cost calculator using the example inputs above. Review the breakdown for intermediate steps (segments, adjustments, or rate changes) so you can see how each input moves the output. Save the result for reference and compare it to your actual scenario.
Step-by-step calculation (mirrors what the tool is doing)
Compute SOL end date
- Filing date: 2023-01-15
- Add 3 years (general SOL period)
- SOL end date: 2026-01-15
Compute time until the SOL-driven closing point
- Current date: 2026-01-10
- Time remaining to 2026-01-15: 5 days
Compute daily cost portion
- Daily rate: $45/day
- Daily cost = 5 days × $45/day = $225
Add one-time closing fee
- One-time fee = $600
Output (example result)
- Total estimated closing cost: $225 + $600 = $825
If you want to verify yourself quickly, use this direct link: **/tools/closing-cost
Sensitivity check
Small changes in dates can meaningfully shift the “time remaining,” especially when you’re near the end of the 3-year general SOL boundary. This section shows how the DocketMath output responds when you change one input at a time—without changing the Minnesota SOL rule.
Sensitivity scenario A: Current date moves 10 days forward
Keep everything else the same, but set current date to 2026-01-20.
- SOL end date remains 2026-01-15
- Time remaining becomes 0 days in a “no time left” model
- Daily cost portion = 0 × $45/day = $0
- Add one-time fee = $600
New total: $600
Takeaway: When the calculation date passes the SOL end date, the variable “time remaining” component often drops to zero, leaving only fixed fees.
Sensitivity scenario B: Filing date moves by 30 days earlier
Set filing date to 2022-12-16 (30 days earlier), current date still 2026-01-10.
- New SOL end date: 3 years from 2022-12-16 → 2025-12-16
- Since current date 2026-01-10 is after SOL end, time remaining becomes 0 days
- Total becomes just the fixed fee
New total: $600
Takeaway: Date changes that move the computed SOL end before the calculation date can dramatically reduce (to zero) the variable part of the cost.
Sensitivity scenario C: Daily cost rate increases by 25%
Keep the original dates (filing 2023-01-15, current 2026-01-10) where time remaining = 5 days, but increase daily rate:
- Original daily rate: $45/day
- New daily rate: $56.25/day (25% increase)
- Daily cost = 5 × $56.25 = $281.25
- Add one-time fee: $600
New total: $881.25
Takeaway: The daily rate scales the variable portion linearly; fixed fees remain unchanged.
Sensitivity summary table
| Change | Time remaining | Daily rate | Daily cost | Closing fee | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (2026-01-10) | 5 days | $45/day | $225 | $600 | $825 |
| Current date +10 days (2026-01-20) | 0 days | $45/day | $0 | $600 | $600 |
| Filing date −30 days (2022-12-16) | 0 days | $45/day | $0 | $600 | $600 |
| Daily rate +25% ($56.25/day) | 5 days | $56.25/day | $281.25 | $600 | $881.25 |
Pitfall to avoid: If you accidentally apply a claim-type-specific SOL (instead of the general/default 3-year SOL under Minn. Stat. § 628.26), your “time remaining” can flip from positive to zero, sharply changing the output.
(Gentle disclaimer: this worked example is informational and uses an example cost model; it isn’t legal advice.)
Related reading
- Average closing costs in Alabama — Rule summary with authoritative citations
- Average closing costs in Alaska — Rule summary with authoritative citations
- Average closing costs in Arizona — Rule summary with authoritative citations
